Search for: "Jones v. American Airlines, Inc." Results 1 - 19 of 19
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm by Mahmoud Khatib
”[44] If a letter of intent falls within the first or second category, courts generally do not consider it binding; but if it falls in the third or fourth category, courts generally consider it a binding contract.[45] For example, in Hunneman Real Estate Corp. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 3:37 pm by Lorene Park
A “deviation from standard procedure may raise an inference of discrimination,” the court explained (Jones v Ottenberg’s Bakers, Inc). [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
You may read other coverage of this elsewhere, as in attendance were Aric Press of The American Lawyer, Leigh Jones of The National Law Journal, David Lat of AboveTheLaw, and other reporters. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 2:00 am
(Public Knowledge)   US Copyright – Decisions S D Ohio: RIAA’s need for discovery was not so urgent: Elektra Entertainment Group, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 4:31 pm
But, more importantly, the AmeriKat has finally experienced a flatbed experience – thank you, American Airline Advantage miles – and now can fully appreciate what all the fuss is about (or was it the unlimited ice cream sundaes and champagne….?) [read post]
29 May 2009, 1:53 pm by Keith Jones
United Airlines, Inc., 527 U.S. 471 (1999) (held that plaintiffs were not disabled under the ADA because corrective mitigating  measures must be taken into account when determining if someone is impaired) and in Toyota Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 1:53 pm by Keith Jones
United Airlines, Inc., 527 U.S. 471 (1999) (held that plaintiffs were not disabled under the ADA because corrective mitigating  measures must be taken into account when determining if someone is impaired) and in Toyota Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. [read post]